Why are we still preselling apartments rather than embracing a ‘build then sell’ model?
New Construction Systems
2 July 2026·Industry News·1 min read

Why are we still preselling apartments rather than embracing a ‘build then sell’ model?

apartment presalesbuild-then-sell modelconstruction financinghousing qualityworkforce stability

General Information Disclaimer

The information on this page is general industry information only and does not constitute legal, engineering, building, insurance, or professional advice. Users should seek independent professional advice relevant to their specific circumstances. While reasonable efforts are made to ensure accuracy, Remedial Building Australia does not guarantee the completeness or reliability of this information. Terms & Conditions


Editorial Summary — Remedial Building Australia

Andrea Sharam argues for a fundamental shift in Australian apartment development from the presale model to a build-then-sell approach. Under presales, developers sell apartments off-the-plan before construction begins, using buyer deposits to fund the build. The alternative model would see developers fund construction upfront, then sell completed apartments to buyers. Sharam contends this shift would deliver multiple benefits: builders gain additional working capital flexibility, completed apartments allow buyers to inspect quality before purchase, demand becomes more predictable and stable, and construction sites maintain consistent workforce engagement rather than feast-famine cycles. The analysis suggests build-then-sell creates conditions for better labour retention and workplace continuity in construction teams.

The presale model currently dominates Australian apartment development because it transfers financial risk and funding requirements to purchasers, allowing developers to proceed with minimal capital. Moving to build-then-sell would require structural changes to development finance, construction bonds, and market expectations. This directly affects strata outcomes—completed building quality improves when builders aren't chasing presale targets, and completed inspections reduce latent defects reaching owner corporations.

Read the original source

Originally reported by Industry News. Editorial summary and analysis prepared by Remedial Building Australia.

Why It Matters

Developers' financing models directly influence construction quality and defect rates in completed Class 2 buildings. Build-then-sell incentivises quality workmanship and labour stability, reducing the hidden defect burden that strata managers inherit. Understanding this policy debate helps remedial consultants and strata professionals recognise systemic drivers of building defects beyond individual site compliance failures.

General observation only — not professional, legal, or engineering advice.

Who May Find This Relevant

Architects & designersRemedial building consultantsContractors & applicatorsEngineers

Source & Attribution

Original publisher: Industry News

Published: 2 July 2026

View original article

This article contains an editorial summary and industry commentary prepared by Remedial Building Australia. It does not reproduce original article wording. Remedial Building Australia is an independent industry information platform and is not affiliated with the original publisher. Content is general information only — not professional, legal, or engineering advice.

Related Resources on This Platform

Remedial Building Australia is an independent industry information platform. Content is provided for general informational purposes only — not professional, engineering, legal, or construction advice. No liability is accepted for reliance on content. External links are provided for reference only; Remedial Building Australia does not endorse third-party content. Terms & Conditions